 |
 |
 |
 |
#907898 - 07/14/09 04:07 PM
Re: We are now requiring 200 posts to post in the "Enter at your own risk" category
[Re: PNWRain]
|
Veteran
Registered: 06/24/08
Posts: 691
Loc: Lost in America
|
PNWRain,
Thanks for your response. This will be my last post on the topic as I have much better things to do with my time and I know that will make the Admin happy. You have some good ideas and I would hope the Admin picked up on them and will consider.
The only point I have ever tried to make is that the number of posts a person makes has very little to do with limiting scams and shills, many of whom (and I'm sorry Admin, I can't give you names or links but you banned some of them recently)have been using this site for a long long time and have more than 200 posts. The concept is like saying if I only believe people who live in Wisconsin, I will always know the truth (and please those of you in Wisconsin, I do not mean to demean you, its the first state that popped into my head). In the 4 years I have "lurked" on the site and the little over one year that I have been signed up, I have been lured into scams by people with over 200 posts and saved by people with just a few posts
As you point out, I'm not that far from 200, but the facts remain the same. And since no matter how many times or ways I try to get the point across, as CLEARLY pointed out, I am only one post. I give up on this topic.
Where I am can be very cold or very hot. Right now its mild and enjoyable. Hope the same for you.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#909558 - 07/19/09 11:39 PM
Re: We are now requiring 200 posts to post in the "Enter at your own risk" category
[Re: Odman]
|
Member
Registered: 06/30/09
Posts: 167
|
As a new poster, I can say, I am not a scammer, but I can understand aprehension of new people. I pretty much, have been reading and reading and reading. I have learned a lot actually in the short time. And I can certainly understand the 200 rule, I can understand those who may not like it as well. But there has to be some kind of order in the house, and it does seem like there are posters not here for the right reasons. I have a lot to share as far as pain goes and issues I dealt with, but I pick and choose those moments to share, but the Rules do not bother me as a newbie, and I do not take offense to it. I guess because after reading and reading lol, I see why it was done. I will say this, I really have learned a lot, and I thank everyone who posts.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#909654 - 07/20/09 10:43 AM
Re: We are now requiring 200 posts to post in the "Enter at your own risk" category
[Re: xanaduu76]
|
Administrator
GRAND Pooh-Bah
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 6370
Loc: DrugBuyers.Com
|
of course all the people who agree with this new policy have well over 200 posts. what a shock. And "most" of the people complaining seem to have less than 200 :-). Is that a shock too? We are trying to see beyond post count and self interest and looking for ways to offer reliable info and making it "harder" for crooks and scammers... in that regard this is the best idea we have come up with so far... What we do when checking the suggestions is we look at member posting history... and we ask ourselves "did his posts help people avoid a scam or not?", "did his posts help others find a reliable source?" Two examples: 1. We feel the mrdoc you posted about is a scam and feel if you had not posted about them there would have been less attention to that scam and less people being scammed 2. Mookieman has not posted in those forum for 6 years so most likely he will not mis not posting nor will we miss his posts... We value the suggestions made by the two poster but they are not sufficient to make us consider a change...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#909697 - 07/20/09 12:49 PM
Re: We are now requiring 200 posts to post in the "Enter at your own risk" category
[Re: stevo1]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 10/18/07
Posts: 1213
|
Stevo - please don't feel bad. Your posts are always welcome. I think I speak for many when I say you are an asset to this site.
And, as far as people making "nonsense" posts to get their count up - that will not fly with admin. I can promise you that. Lurkers know this. Oh, and another part of the rule change is: those posts will not be counted - so a non-issue.
People can many kinds of contributions to this site: offering their personal experiences with sites, give warning about others, offering support to other members, etc.
If anyone feels they have nothing to offer a topic - well, OK - but we all have lived different lives and I just bet you have some jewel of wisdom (no sarcasm intended) that would benefit others. Share it.
As Admin has repeatedly stated - this is an info site. And as Stevo stated - what kind of a site would this be if everyone simply read?
So dive in, you'll like what you find. I, for one, welcome as many people to post as possible.
Stay cool, fellow posters and we'll stumble forward. Eh?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#909709 - 07/20/09 01:33 PM
Re: We are now requiring 200 posts to post in the "Enter at your own risk" category
[Re: PNWRain]
|
Newbie
Registered: 06/12/09
Posts: 49
|
I agree there needs to be some type verification, just didn't think that just because everyone with 200+ posts agrees means that you should as well. You should have your own opinion. I didn't do it to start any trouble, just think you should post your opinion and not go with everyone elses. I'm from the USA though(don't know if you are)where everyone has a right to have there own opinion, no matter what that is.
Before you make any more replies, I have talked to the administrator about this rule and he told me to make my suggestions here. I was just reading through the thread and I was only on page one when I read your comment, and I replied to it. I used to be a member when it was easier to get meds online, lost email address from lack of use and forgot username, so now I look like a newbie. Even with this, I still did not have 200 posts because I just do not post much and I do not want to make a bunch of useless posts(Like even this one) to get my count up.
I wanted to read through the entire post, before I made any suggestions, in case someone else has made the same suggestion already.
I will not post again until I read through the hole thread and that may not be ASAP since it is a long post. I will post a few ideas that I have, when I am done reading the entire post.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#909735 - 07/20/09 02:55 PM
Re: We are now requiring 200 posts to post in the "Enter at your own risk" category
[Re: Mr_carl_pain]
|
Member
Registered: 06/30/09
Posts: 167
|
Okay this is how I look at things and maybe I am just odd lol who knows because I am certainly no a conformist per say, but I do realize with everything in life there comes concessions. I certainly as I said before understand how it might I guess bother someone with the post thing, but on the other hand myself being a newbie just well part of the day. I learn alot from reading. I try to answer posts, that interest me, and eventually it will hit, 200. I guess I look at it this way no rush, take my time, get to know others and let them get to know me. Anyoen can be a scammer, I think is the point be it with one post or 100000 posts. People are people, and at least there has to be I would think some form of hoping to find a safeguard. It is way to easy to be a scammer but also fall victim to scams. People sometimes do things in depserate times, on bot sides, is my thinking and it is absolutely wrong however, there has to be some form of protection and if it means the 200 mark so be it. Like I said I am knew but it really does not phase me. I try to look at both sides and see the reasoning and feelings both sides. I just do not think it is anything personal against anyone. I even do not take it personal when people think all new people are scammers or shills. You have to prove yourself. Is it right, well no, but even in real life at jobs in social circles people have to prove who they are. Anyway just my opinion, lol and we all know what they are like lol we all have one.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#909739 - 07/20/09 03:24 PM
Re: We are now requiring 200 posts to post in the "Enter at your own risk" category
[Re: Administrator]
|
Newbie
Registered: 06/12/09
Posts: 49
|
I still think the best way to monitor for shills is to monitor IPs( I know db does that) and check a posters thread history for yourself..
No way to check on multiple ID by IP's. Sounds good but it is not doable... the crooks that work the boards, the ones we try to make their work harder... use proxies and anonymizers I suggested this in my PM. You made a post about a user with multiple user names. Wasn't it the IP address being the same with all of the user names, the way you could tell? If it can't be done because the crooks and Shills use proxies and anoymizers, then can't you just not allow a new member to even sign up, unless they have a valid IP address? I am no computer wiz so I have no idea what a proxy is, is it an IP address that shows the general internet providers IP address, like when you use cable as your connection? As a person that looks like a newbie, I do not disagree that some rule needs to be made. I just think that there could be a better way or some exceptions should be made. I think that if you have been a member for over a year, regardless of post count, then you can be an exception to the rule. Another suggestion would be to just limit the number of members like some other sites do. Then when these people with multiple ID's cancel their accounts, a new person could sign up, as long as their IP address has not been used before. You could also require more information to sign up like having a newbie answer a medical quesionaire about why he needs to view this board and the condition they have that requires them to have to have these drugs. I think that this would deter a lot of crooks and shills if you made the questionaire long enough. A person that really does need a medication would though. I do know that it seems real easy to sign up here, when other similar sites have some type of review system that will not let you sign in until all the info you give checks out. Another way to make an exception would be if you were refered by a long time member or known legitimate member. I am certain that a lot of people that are under 200 posts are suffering from not being able to post. An example would be if I just wanted to ask if a website I received in an email had been successfully used by another member. I know that it would take some effort on the Administrator and Moderators to review a post before it is posted, but this is also another suggestion, review every post in those few forums that now require 200 posts. If it sounds like a crook or Shill and the person is new, then don't post it. On the other hand, if the person can prove to the Admin. that his post is legit by showing the received package for example or showing a WU receipt that you sent money to and didn't receive anything, then the Admin or Mod can post the intended post after they are convinced that there comments are true. A rule must be in place to protect the information given here, I have no arguement about that, but just making a number of post requirement is not really the best method IMO. If none of my ideas sound good or they are not possible, then others should post a suggestion instead of just complaining or giving their opinion. They are not going to change anything unless something better comes up. Hope some of these ideas can be used. If not, I and hopefully others will come up with some more. I could start posting a lot more then I used to, but if I am only doing it to get to 200, then I am certain that all the posts will not be informative or off topic and I do not want to do that. I will just deal with the issue now and hopefully a better idea comes up and hopefully it is sooner then later, because I do believe that a lot of people have good info to share with all of us and a lot of people are getting scammed because they can't ask or others can not post feedback.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|