 |
 |
 |
 |
#678431 - 04/03/08 09:38 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: TheMoodyBlue]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1185
Loc: going down?
|
Nite,
The DEA will now be able to say that any prescription that is not issued according to their regulations is not a valid prescription. This Act seems to codify what is in DEA regulations that says a "valid prescription" must be issued in the context of a "legitimate doctor-patient relationship" which must include a face to face, in person examination (no exceptions in the policy that I know of), diagnostic testing and other lab work where appropriate (x-rays, etc), a logical connection to the diagnosis and the medication prescribed and (I am sure they will push the envelope now on this last one) an "appropriate" amount (read "the smallest effective number") prescribed.
I am afraid that they are going to use this law to severely limit even what brick and mortar, face to face doctors prescribe to their patients. I fear that the days of a month's supply of #120 Norco 10/325's for legitimate pain are soon done, although I hope not. DEA simply does not think that the prescribing of C-II or C-III analgesic narcotics are ever indicated for anything short of terminal, end stage cancers. I have heard of people who were directly told by DEA personnel that pain and serious chronic injuries are simply not warranted to prescribe, for example, hydrocodone at all, ever, and that doing so was probably irresponsible medicine and a criminal distribution of controlled substances. DEA will now be practicing medicine more than ever, which is also - last time I checked - a felony as well unless each agent doing so has a medical license (which we all know virtually all of them DO NOT). Irresponsible physicians need to stop irresponsibly prescribing C-III's like candy, and DEA needs to stop practicing medicine without a license. Good Post MoodyBlue! Particularly item 7 of the "Additional Requirements" part of the bill: `(7) The following statement, unless revised by the Attorney General by regulation: `This online pharmacy will only dispense a controlled substance to a person who has a valid prescription issued for a legitimate medical purpose based upon a medical relationship with a prescribing practitioner. This includes at least one prior in-person medical evaluation or medical evaluation via telemedicine in accordance with applicable requirements of section 309 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 829).'.
_________________________
Peace, ~Rubix~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678443 - 04/03/08 10:01 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: Ruggie]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1185
Loc: going down?
|
If they think that closing down the few remaining internet Pharmacies Just to point out something, OCS's are not online pharmacies, they are not a pharmacy at all, not meant in offense of tigersmom at all, I just see that saying so much and I wish it would change. JMO You know? Ruggie makes an excellent point - this bill is about pharmaciesnot Online Consult Services ( OCS) which is most likely the reason so many OCS are turning to Direct Script Services. And if that is the case, the direct script only OCS have nothing to worry about. It is unfortunate however for the OCS that do both or only traditional consulting using pharmacies. I'm sure the legals are not going to stop there either. One way or another, they will halt all OCS sooner than later. jmo
_________________________
Peace, ~Rubix~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678448 - 04/03/08 10:09 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: Administrator]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1185
Loc: going down?
|
Obviously any measure that saves lifes and protects kids is going to be a good and popular cause... but will the "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" help do that?
How would that law change things for TriStateHealthPartners.net, Direct-scripts.net, Chatcp.com, our info site, IOP's like Todofarmacia.com, or the blatantly illegal sites like feelfreedom.org? Laws like this one have made it increasingly difficult for legitimate patients to utilize the services of Online Consulting Services and pharmacies - let alone the people who are not and abuse the systems. So, I am sure these type of bills/laws have helped curb some of the illegal activity. Look back a few years - there were quite a few NROP's where you could buy hydrocodone for instance, quite easily actually. Which is where I am sure most of the kids were able to obtain things with a click of the mouse (as reported). Today, that is not true - which has saved many lives I am sure. The problem is that law makers, congress people and many parents are confused that ALL OCS are the same and therefore trying to stop every one of them from operating. In my opinion, that action is not going to help keep kids drug free and alive. Education, parent involvment, school involvment etc is what is going to help our children.
_________________________
Peace, ~Rubix~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678458 - 04/03/08 10:31 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: RubixCubeTO]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 12/16/02
Posts: 1083
Loc: My own theoretically ideal wor...
|
Ryan's mother and the Ryan's Cause folks don't want to hear how little Ryan was really a junkie, he was NOT inexperienced in opiates at all. The kid had a credit card, his parents obviously never checked it. Never checked the packages he was getting, and had no idea their son was out 'raving' and tripping. They claim it was a total shock and these big mean drug dealers just randomly sent drugs to him, and Ryan must have just clicked and had them sent. This was back in the day of the DolphinRX days and TropicalRX...etc.. BUT...Ryans parents were clueless about their son's drug usage. It wasn't the hydro he got from a pharmacy online that killed him. I'm so sick of hearing her 'Internet Nightmare Story' and how the perfect family lost their perfect son. How about making a Foundation for parents to KNOW WHAT THE HECK THEIR KIDS ARE DOING???
_________________________
If you ever become a mother, can I have one of the puppies?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678460 - 04/03/08 10:36 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: Administrator]
|
GRAND Pooh-Bah
Registered: 07/20/05
Posts: 5325
Loc: Reality
|
Obviously any measure that saves lifes and protects kids is going to be a good and popular cause... but will the "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" help do that?
How would that law change things for TriStateHealthPartners.net, Direct-scripts.net, Chatcp.com, our info site, IOP's like Todofarmacia.com, or the blatantly illegal sites like feelfreedom.org? admin, you forgot UMEDSONLINE which is every bit as illegal as FF.
_________________________
"Smoking, drinking, never thinking of tomorrow, nonchalant..Is that all you really want? No, sophisticated lady..The Duke"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678463 - 04/03/08 10:40 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: RubixCubeTO]
|
GRAND Pooh-Bah
Registered: 07/20/05
Posts: 5325
Loc: Reality
|
If they think that closing down the few remaining internet Pharmacies Just to point out something, OCS's are not online pharmacies, they are not a pharmacy at all, not meant in offense of tigersmom at all, I just see that saying so much and I wish it would change. JMO You know? Ruggie makes an excellent point - this bill is about pharmaciesnot Online Consult Services (OCS) which is most likely the reason so many OCS are turning to Direct Script Services. And if that is the case, the direct script only OCS have nothing to worry about. It is unfortunate however for the OCS that do both or only traditional consulting using pharmacies. I'm sure the legals are not going to stop there either. One way or another, they will halt all OCS sooner than later. jmo Not true. This Bill will effect the DS places as well as ROPS using fulfillment pharmacies. While the Bill may not specifically make the OCS itself "illegal" it will make it impossible to contract the Doctors who now write for them, unless they can schedule a face to face meeting between their customers and their contracted physicians. The DS sites still issue prescriptions for controlled substances without a physical face to face with the prescribing Physician. Their prescriptions will also be illegal. Period. Only the new service, NNCIP will be exempt as they DO require a F2F at least once a year with their Doctor.
_________________________
"Smoking, drinking, never thinking of tomorrow, nonchalant..Is that all you really want? No, sophisticated lady..The Duke"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678473 - 04/03/08 10:51 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: tigersmom]
|
GRAND Pooh-Bah
Registered: 05/16/02
Posts: 3498
Loc: NY/NJ
|
admin, you forgot UMEDSONLINE which is every bit as illegal as FF. Why, once S 980 is put into law, umeds will be an excellent place for rich, underage kids to get prescription medication for "kicks". That's all that will be left, places way beyond the reach of regulators. Places that don't have to worry about pesky laws. ---- We've reported it before, but this is the accurate account or Ryan Haight, a little different than what the current media reports. ---- Quote: Quicksilver was his screen name on the ugly board where his "skills" were honed. A couple of quotes from the time to put things in context: Quote: ------------------------------------------------------------ what exactly happened to ryan? i guess i mean how did he mess up? As best we know - he injected an unknown amount of morphine, fell unconscious and possibly choked on his vomit - we don't have any definitive answers, but thats what was pieced together (none of it can be confirmed at this point) .. there is a chance he lapsed into respiratory apnea, but that would take a fairly large amount of morphine to accomplish... Again, that is what we believe happend based upon the testimony of those who had talked to him in his last hours... all we are certin of is that he had been taking narcotics (hydrocodone and morphine) - he had made a number of comments about injecting it, and had even had a lengthy discussion with me about the technicalities of it... ------------------------------------------------------------ Quote: ------------------------------------------------------------ Online, Ryan's death was met with disbelief. "I considered Ryan to be the most experienced and wise person I know when it came to drugs . . . I was so incredibly shocked," wrote ZeroHawk. And from beyond the grave came Ryan's own account of one of his last trips, sent in an e-mail started at 10:28 p.m. on Feb. 10, 2001. He had taken drugs he had received "in the mail that day," grabbed a Sprite and ice and wrote of "the little whirlpools of color moving all over. Not TOO much to handle. They were PERFECT." ------------------------------------------------------------ I hate repeating the facts surrounding the sad demise of a young adult (I believe he was 18), but the truth has been so distorted over the past 7 years since this tragic event. People * must * hear more about us! I see Stars if I try to lift anything over 10 pounds. That's when I'm well enough to try that..... May g-d rest his soul patient2all
_________________________
I'll be back...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678478 - 04/03/08 11:02 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: tigersmom]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1185
Loc: going down?
|
If they think that closing down the few remaining internet Pharmacies Just to point out something, OCS's are not online pharmacies, they are not a pharmacy at all, not meant in offense of tigersmom at all, I just see that saying so much and I wish it would change. JMO You know? Ruggie makes an excellent point - this bill is about pharmaciesnot Online Consult Services (OCS) which is most likely the reason so many OCS are turning to Direct Script Services. And if that is the case, the direct script only OCS have nothing to worry about. It is unfortunate however for the OCS that do both or only traditional consulting using pharmacies. I'm sure the legals are not going to stop there either. One way or another, they will halt all OCS sooner than later. jmo Not true. This Bill will effect the DS places as well as ROPS using fulfillment pharmacies. While the Bill may not specifically make the OCS itself "illegal" it will make it impossible to contract the Doctors who now write for them, unless they can schedule a face to face meeting between their customers and their contracted physicians. The DS sites still issue prescriptions for controlled substances without a physical face to face with the prescribing Physician. Their prescriptions will also be illegal. Period. Only the new service, NNCIP will be exempt as they DO require a F2F at least once a year with their Doctor. Excellent point tigersmom! You are very correct, but didn't Madison Pain Clinic require F2F visits? What is NNCIP doing that MPC didn't?  Anyone know?
_________________________
Peace, ~Rubix~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678555 - 04/03/08 12:55 PM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: RubixCubeTO]
|
GRAND Pooh-Bah
Registered: 07/20/05
Posts: 5325
Loc: Reality
|
The essay written by Falco and Heyman arguing for putting pressure on the credit card cos and internet providers is on the Washington Post website, a few of us wrote letters to the Editor to point out the fallacies in their article, but our voices go unheard unlike Mr and Mrs Haight who apparently will do anything to absolve themselves of the guilt they must feel over their son's death. If they think that closing down the few remaining internet Pharmacies who have taken precautions to make certain that they aren't selling drugs to spoiled rich kids will protect other teenagers from overdosing they are sadly mistaken. And, as we all know, this Legislation will hurt the adults that now use the legit OCS that are still in business. obviously more of us need to bring those issues out - I have and will continue to do so. C'mon people, write - call - email. There are more of us that know the truth than parents who don't. I wondered where ruggie was coming from in implying that I had confused the pharmacies with the OCS, I simply made a mistake, I was indeed thinking of the OCS themselves.
_________________________
"Smoking, drinking, never thinking of tomorrow, nonchalant..Is that all you really want? No, sophisticated lady..The Duke"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678752 - 04/03/08 07:00 PM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: FangZ]
|
GRAND Pooh-Bah
Registered: 03/25/04
Posts: 8800
Loc: Right Here
|
Ryan's mother and the Ryan's Cause folks don't want to hear how little Ryan was really a junkie, he was NOT inexperienced in opiates at all. The kid had a credit card, his parents obviously never checked it. Never checked the packages he was getting, and had no idea their son was out 'raving' and tripping. They claim it was a total shock and these big mean drug dealers just randomly sent drugs to him, and Ryan must have just clicked and had them sent. This was back in the day of the DolphinRX days and TropicalRX...etc.. BUT...Ryans parents were clueless about their son's drug usage. It wasn't the hydro he got from a pharmacy online that killed him. I'm so sick of hearing her 'Internet Nightmare Story' and how the perfect family lost their perfect son. How about making a Foundation for parents to KNOW WHAT THE HECK THEIR KIDS ARE DOING??? I am with you on this fangz.
_________________________
Takes a Lickin' & Keeps on Tickin'
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#678986 - 04/04/08 10:13 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: 1zlu]
|
GRAND Pooh-Bah
Registered: 05/16/02
Posts: 3498
Loc: NY/NJ
|
I can't believe there aren't pages and pages of posts about this!! Since the introduction of SB 980 and two similar bills, we've had numerous threads urging activism efforts. In fact, since the "lower" part of the board gets so few views, I had taken to opening threads in "Open Discussion". All of us who have a stake in this are open to ideas. I've written articles, but our plight isn't taken seriously by the still healthy American public. We have as much credibility as the "Legalize MJ" movements in most peoples' eyes. Oddly, Ryan Haight's favorite board is still out there and thriving. I did some wild things when I was much younger, but it never occurred to me to go into my chemistry set to try to get a buzz! ---- The DEA has already done a pretty good pre-reconnicense job on decimating any former viable, compliant OCS. The current crop of OCS's, by and large, are a bunch of clowns. With few exceptions, they're a little hard to defend of late.... ----- nncip is making a serious valid effort to forge a future for us. Their success, if it happens, will spawn imitators of their model (which has little to do with what MPC was about). ----- In the meantime, we can give it our best shot, but frankly it doesn't look good for us. Never thought I'd be saying that.  patient2all
_________________________
I'll be back...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#679019 - 04/04/08 11:30 AM
Re: "Ryan Haight Online Consumer Protection Act" (S980)
[Re: kserah]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 12/16/02
Posts: 1083
Loc: My own theoretically ideal wor...
|
And if you notice, different media stories about Ryan will tell a different age/medication/sob story depending on how they want to slant the story. Some say he was 15, some 17, he was ordering Oxy over the internet with just a click...by accident, his parents knew everything their lovely child did...the computer was in the family room. It goes on and on. I've made numerous posts about this over the years. I feel bad whenever a young person dies. BUT, HAD HIS PARENTS TAKEN SOME RESPONSIBILITY, I think it wouldn't be so bad in my mind. That website Ryan visited and had many real life friends from is still up, still going. They have memorialized "QuickSilver". My point on all this is the sites that Ryan used to get the Narcotics are all gone now. Their job is done. There are no more. Those of us around in those days remember those sites, right? Now, it's almost harder to get meds from an OCS referral system than at your local doctor. Good grief, if a kid is going to OD on 10mg codeine from an IOP, then jeez...we have a problem. But, my bigger point I've always had with the "Ryans Cause" foundation is ...HIS PARENTS HAD NO DANG IDEA WHAT THEIR SON WAS DOING. This kid was a raver, hard core. He had a damn credit card. He was young enough his parents should have checked the statement. The excuse that they "Thought he was buying baseball cards" just doesn't fly with me. If he were buying guns and ammo, would they use that excuse when he shot up a school? Well, hell, I THOUGHT my kid was working on her Nobel Peace Prize speech. You thought your kid took a bath? You thought your kid ate dinner? WTH?? (I have some personal stock in situations like this, my 15 year old nephew shot himself after YEARS and YEARS of vicious fighting with his mother and numerous boyfriends of hers. After he dies, his mother goes on the "we were the PERFECT FAMILY and had the PERFECT HOME" speil so everyone who didn't know the inside story felt sorry for her and it helped ease her guilt *to the outside world*) This Ryan kid had a computer in his room, an open credit card, access to money, parties, friends who helped him trip, etc...the parents had him out of their way to do whatever they did in the evenings to NOT know what he was doing. Notice the comments section on Ryan's Cause website is down. They couldn't stop the people who weren't all "I'm soooo sorry and we must put an end to these big bad pharmacies who made your kid take their products" This shouldn't have a darn thing to do with chronic pain sufferers, but it does. And all we can do is write letters and try and be heard.
_________________________
If you ever become a mother, can I have one of the puppies?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|